Chapter 7: Openness in Scholarly Communication: Conceptual Framework and Challenges to Innovation

Clifford Tatum, and Nicholas Jankowski

Abstract
Across the domains of scholarship, expectations are high for development of “new forms of scientific discovery and scholarly research” previously considered impossible (Arms and Larsen 2007, 3). In contrast to such expectations, recent empirical research on scholarly communication suggests low rates of adoption of the technologies that underpin the vision of an e-infrastructure. Instead, there is continued preference for publishing in traditional, high-ranked journals and book-length monographs (Harley et al. 2010). At the same time, publishers are providing digital versions of articles and books, and open access journals are increasing in number. Nevertheless, the format and structure of formal scholarly communication remains largely unchanged.

In less formal communication settings, researchers are inclined to adopt a variety of the freely available internet products and services. Without overt concern for the academic reward system in the informal setting, scholars are experimenting with new practices. These occur differently across disciplinary contexts, degrees of collaboration, and stages in career (Procter et al. 2010a). A general analysis of technologically-facilitated scholarly communication is complicated by differences in situated practices across disciplinary and national cultures. Common among these new informal venues and practices is an environment of openness, less compatible with the role of formal scholarly communication, particularly regarding the academic reward system.

In light of these challenges, we propose an analytical framework of openness to understand better scholarly communication in the digital era. The chapter begins with a panoramic “snapshot” of developments already underway. This is followed by elaboration of the conceptual framework of openness afforded by digital media and the proliferation of user-generated content associated with Web 2.0 (O'Reilly 2005; Vossen, and Hagemann 2007). Further, we situate these changing practices within the rubric of e-research. The chapter introduces this perspective, followed by a review of scholarly communication more generally. We then focus on the dynamics of openness in formal and informal communication. This serves as a means to examine emerging practices and the ways in which such practices help us to understand challenges and opportunities in scholarly communication. Against this conceptual backdrop, we offer illustrations of both formal and informal communicative forms, focusing on emerging practices in the informal realm and recent digital publishing initiatives by academic publishers. These illustrations serve as a basis for examining the tension and flux in scholarly communication associated with dimensions of openness, and for proposing avenues for further empirical exploration.


 

Figure 1: Components of e-Research (adapted from Jankowski, 2009, 8)

Figure 7: Diagram of Openness Framework (Tatum 2010)

Figure 8: Nelson’s notion of Evolutionary List File (ELF) applied to historiography.

 


Reference list

ACLS. 2006. Our Cultural Commonwealth: The report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006. American Council of Learned Societies.

Arms, William and Ronald Larsen. 2007. The Future of Scholarly Communication: Building the Infrastructure for Cyberscholarship. September 26, 2007. National Science Foundation & British Joint Information Systems Committee.

Beaulieu, Anne and Elena Simakova. 2006. "Textured Connectivity: an ethnographic approach to understanding the timescape of hyperlinks." Cybermetrics, 10 (1).

Bradley, Jean-Claude. "Open Notebook Science Using Blogs and Wikis." Nature Precedings.

Bush, Vannevar. 1995. "As We May Think - Atlantic Monthly July 1945." The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 1 (2).

Chesbrough, Henry, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New paradigm..

Chesbrough, Henry. 2006. Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.

Chesbrough, Henry William. 2006. Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Simcoe, Tim. 2006. "Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights." In Open innovation: Research a New Paradigm, edited by Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, Oxford University Press.

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York Univ. Press.

Fry, Jenny and Sanna Talja. 2007. "The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources." Journal of Information Science, 33 (2): 115-133.

Fry, J.. 2006. "Scholarly Research and Information Practices: A Domain Analytic Approach." Inf. Process. Manage., 42 (1): 299-316.

Fry, Jenny. 2006. "Scholarly research and information practices: A domain analytic approach." Information Processing and Management , 42 (1): 299-316.

Garvey, William. 1979. Communication, the Essence of Science: Facilitating Information Exchange Among Librarians, Scientists, Engineers, and Students. Pergamon.

Garvey, William, Nan Lin, Carnot Nelson, and Kazuo Tomita. 1972. "Research studies in patterns of scientific communication: II. The role of the national meeting in scientific and technical communication." Information Storage and Retrieval, 8 (4): 159-169.

Gray, Kathleen, Celia Thompson, Rosemary Clerehan, Judithe Sheard, and Margaret Hamilton. 2008. "Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity." The Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2): 112-118.

Harley, Diane, Sophia Acord, Sarah Earl-Novell, Shannon Lawrence, and C. King. 2010. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. January 2010. Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.

Hendler, James. 2007. "Reinventing Academic Publishing-Part 1." IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (5): 2-3.

Hippel, Eric and Georg Krogh. 2003. "Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science." ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 14 (2): 209-223.

IETF. "The Internet Engineering Task Force." 2010. http://www.ietf.org/about/standards-process.html (accessed 2010-03-25).

2009. "The contours and challenges of e-research." In E-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice, edited by Nicholas Jankowski, Routledge.

Jankowski, Nicholas and Martine Van Selm. 2000. "Traditional news media online: An examination of added values." Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 25 (1): 85-102.

Juhasz, Alexandra. "Learning the 5 Lessons of YouTube: After Trying to Teach There, I Don’t Believe the Hype." International Journal of Learning and Media.

Kavada, Anastasia. 2010. "Email lists and participatory democracy in the European Social Forum." Media, Culture & Society, 32 (3): 355-372.

Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How professors think. Harvard University Press.

Merton, Robert and Norman Storer. 1979. The sociology of science. University of Chicago Press.

Nentwich, Michael. 2005. "Cyberscience: Modelling ICT-induced changes of the scholarly communication system." Information, Communication & Society, 8 (4): 542.

Orlikowski, Wanda. 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations." Organization Science, 3 (3): 398-427.

Raymond, Eric. 2001. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Safari Books Online, Revised Edition.

Roosendaal, Hans and Peter Geurts. "Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay." 1997. http://doc.utwente.nl/60395/ (accessed 2009-10-07 07:53:06).

Tatum, Clifford. 2005. "Deconstructing Google bombs: A breach of symbolic power or just a goofy prank?" First Monday, 10 (10).

2008. The hyperlinked society: questioning connections in the digital age. Edited by Joseph Turow and Lokman Tsui University of Michigan Press.

Halavais, Alexander. 2008. "The Hyperlink as Organizing Principle." In The hyperlinked society: questioning connections in the digital age, edited by Joseph Turow and Lokman Tsui, University of Michigan Press.

Vossen, Gottfried and Stephan Hagemann. 2007. Unleashing Web 2.0: From Concepts to Creativity. Morgan Kaufmann.

W3C. "The World Wide Web Consortium." 2010. http://www.w3.org/ (accessed 2010-03-25).

Wesch, Michael. 2007. "Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us." 2007.

Whitley, Richard. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford University Press, USA, 2.

Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. The MIT Press.